GeForce MX450 12W vs Radeon 660M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.94no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRembrandt+TU117S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed1500 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate45.6052.08
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS1.667 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2456
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 12 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

MX450 12W, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and GeForce MX450 12W. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12W
GeForce MX450 12W

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 322 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GeForce MX450 12W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.