GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Radeon 625

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 625 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 625
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.84

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms 625 by a whopping 2051% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78932
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.60
Power efficiency3.9614.68
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 24GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed730 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58339.8
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 625 2.84
RTX 3070 Ti 61.09
+2051%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 625 1094
RTX 3070 Ti 23568
+2054%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−2200%
184
+2200%
1440p4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
4K3−4
−2100%
66
+2100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.26
1440pno data6.11
4Kno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3380%
174
+3380%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1800%
171
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10700%
100−110
+10700%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−4775%
190−200
+4775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1514%
110−120
+1514%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2660%
138
+2660%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2140%
110−120
+2140%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1529%
220−230
+1529%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−941%
220−230
+941%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5067%
150−160
+5067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1571%
110−120
+1571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1975%
240−250
+1975%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−292%
140−150
+292%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1311%
120−130
+1311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10700%
100−110
+10700%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−4775%
190−200
+4775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1514%
110−120
+1514%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2320%
121
+2320%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2140%
110−120
+2140%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1529%
220−230
+1529%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−941%
220−230
+941%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5067%
150−160
+5067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1571%
110−120
+1571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−2533%
316
+2533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−821%
120−130
+821%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−292%
140−150
+292%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1044%
103
+1044%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10700%
100−110
+10700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1514%
110−120
+1514%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2120%
111
+2120%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2140%
110−120
+2140%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1529%
220−230
+1529%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1005%
243
+1005%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−2183%
274
+2183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−950%
147
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−184%
108
+184%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1571%
110−120
+1571%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−4550%
93
+4550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2267%
70−75
+2267%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2529%
184
+2529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−5150%
100−110
+5150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1271%
230−240
+1271%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1633%
100−110
+1633%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2800%
58
+2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 95−100
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 46

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
+0%
205
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+0%
119
+0%

This is how Radeon 625 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 2200% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 2350% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 2100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 10700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 60 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 61.09
Recency 13 May 2019 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 290 Watt

Radeon 625 has 480% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 2051.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 625 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 145 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5967 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.