Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile vs Radeon 540X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking701not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameLexaTiger Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2018 (6 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed980 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1046 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4744.00
Floating-point processing power1.071 TFLOPS1.408 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2018 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540X and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540X is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540X
Radeon 540X
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 315 votes

Rate Radeon 540X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 52 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.