Quadro NVS 320M vs Radeon 530

Place in the ranking	810	1220
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.67	1.87
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Weston	G84
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	9 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	32
Core clock speed	730 MHz	575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,550 million	289 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	9.200
Floating-point processing power	0.7864 TFLOPS	0.0736 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-HE
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.3	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.65
+391%

NVS 320M 0.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 530 1021
+391%

NVS 320M 208

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

15
+400%

3−4

−400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 +300%	4−5 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8 +167%	3−4 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	10 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	12 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	35 +400%	7−8 −400%
Hitman 3	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Metro Exodus	13 +550%	2−3 −550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 +550%	2−3 −550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +200%	6−7 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	32 +433%	6−7 −433%
Hitman 3	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Metro Exodus	5 +400%	1−2 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +800%	1−2 −800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Hitman 3	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+500%

1−2

−500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

This is how Radeon 530 and NVS 320M compete in popular games:

Radeon 530 is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 530 is 1400% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the NVS 320M is 67% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 530 is ahead in 33 tests (94%)
NVS 320M is ahead in 1 test (3%)
there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.65	0.54
Recency	18 April 2017	9 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	20 Watt

Radeon 530 has a 390.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 320M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.