Tesla P100 DGXS vs Radeon 520

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking873not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.84no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBanksGP100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)5 April 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203584
Core clock speed1030 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors690 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60331.5
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS10.61 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz715 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s732.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 5 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 520 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 500% lower power consumption.

Tesla P100 DGXS, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 and Tesla P100 DGXS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 is a notebook card while Tesla P100 DGXS is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520
Radeon 520
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 334 votes

Rate Radeon 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.