GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX A5500

Place in performance ranking	38	5
Place by popularity	not in top-100	76
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.68	29.80
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GA102	AD104-400
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	$3965	$837 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti has 1012% better value for money than RTX A5500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10240	7680
Core clock speed	no data	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	532.8	626.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	336 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	16 GB/s	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A5500 55.66

RTX 4070 Ti 82.26
+47.8%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms RTX A5500 by 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX A5500 21494

RTX 4070 Ti 31767
+47.8%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms RTX A5500 by 48% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 −50.7%	226 +50.7%
1440p	100−110 −50%	150 +50%
4K	60−65 −55%	93 +55%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

150−160

−57.3%

236
+57.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −56.5%	130−140 +56.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −52.5%	240−250 +52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 −55.7%	218 +55.7%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −57.3%	110−120 +57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −54.6%	200−210 +54.6%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −56.9%	250−260 +56.9%
Hitman 3	80−85 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 −55.7%	467 +55.7%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −55%	120−130 +55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 −64.3%	575 +64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −52.6%	140−150 +52.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −56.5%	130−140 +56.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −52.5%	240−250 +52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	120−130 −54.2%	185 +54.2%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −57.3%	110−120 +57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −54.6%	200−210 +54.6%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −56.9%	250−260 +56.9%
Hitman 3	80−85 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −50.9%	300−350 +50.9%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −50.9%	83 +50.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −55%	120−130 +55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −57.7%	473 +57.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	300−310 −51%	453 +51%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −52.6%	140−150 +52.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −56.5%	130−140 +56.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 −51.8%	167 +51.8%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −57.3%	110−120 +57.3%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −56.9%	250−260 +56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −52.6%	351 +52.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 −51.9%	410 +51.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 −48%	222 +48%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −52%	152 +52%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
−55%

120−130

+55%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −50.9%	160−170 +50.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −51.6%	140−150 +51.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −54.3%	100−110 +54.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −49.3%	110−120 +49.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −50%	105 +50%
Far Cry 5	120−130 −51.7%	182 +51.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −52.1%	210−220 +52.1%
Hitman 3	80−85 −51.3%	120−130 +51.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −51.7%	273 +51.7%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −48%	148 +48%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 −55.6%	280 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −57%	150−160 +57%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −51.3%	121 +51.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
−48.2%

120−130

+48.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −60%	85−90 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 −52%	75−80 +52%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −51.1%	130−140 +51.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −48.6%	104 +48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −49%	149 +49%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −60%	70−75 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −48.6%	50−55 +48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −60%	48 +60%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −50.9%	160−170 +50.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −61%	161 +61%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −49.3%	112 +49.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −51.1%	68 +51.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−52.3%

95−100
+52.3%

This is how RTX A5500 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is 51% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti is 50% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti is 55% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	55.66	82.26
Recency	22 March 2022	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	285 Watt