RTX A500 vs RTX A500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A500 Mobile with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

RTX A500 Mobile
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
17.52

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking314315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.1020.10
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA107SGA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed832 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1537 MHz1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)60 Watt
Texture fill rate98.37113.3
Floating-point processing power6.296 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6464
Tensor Cores6464
Ray Tracing Cores1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A500 Mobile 17.52
RTX A500 17.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A500 Mobile 6737
RTX A500 6737

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+0%
45−50
+0%
1440p25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Valorant 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 66
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Valorant 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
World of Tanks 210−220
+1.9%
210−220
−1.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+8%
50−55
−8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Valorant 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0.6%
160−170
−0.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Valorant 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how RTX A500 Mobile and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 10 November 2021

RTX A500 Mobile has an age advantage of 4 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX A500 Mobile and RTX A500.

Be aware that RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 88 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 139 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.