Jetson Nano vs RTX A500 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking309not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.40no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGA107SGM20B
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed832 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed1537 MHz921 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)10 Watt
Texture fill rate98.3714.74
Floating-point processing power6.296 TFLOPS0.2358 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6416
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA8.65.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 10 Watt

RTX A500 Mobile has a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A500 Mobile and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Jetson Nano is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 88 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.