Arc 130T Mobile vs RTX A4500 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameGA104Arrow Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5888896
Core clock speed510 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate223.6123.2
Floating-point processing power14.31 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs9628
TMUs18456
Tensor Cores184112
Ray Tracing Cores467

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A4500 Max-Q and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Arc 130T Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
RTX A4500 Max-Q
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4500 Max-Q or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.