GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs RTX A4000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
33.46
+54.4%

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.0928.66
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1140 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate268.8no data
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs160no data
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+40.8%
71
−40.8%
1440p50−55
+47.1%
34
−47.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+2.5%
81
−2.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+67.3%
45−50
−67.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+34%
90−95
−34%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+29.7%
64
−29.7%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+37.3%
83
−37.3%
Fortnite 150−160
+35%
110−120
−35%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+48.9%
90−95
−48.9%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+50.7%
75−80
−50.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+67.3%
45−50
−67.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+55.4%
90−95
−55.4%
Valorant 210−220
+31.9%
160−170
−31.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+34%
90−95
−34%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+9.1%
250−260
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+80.4%
46
−80.4%
Dota 2 140−150
+17.4%
120−130
−17.4%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+50%
76
−50%
Fortnite 150−160
+35%
110−120
−35%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+48.9%
90−95
−48.9%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+50.7%
75−80
−50.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+34.1%
91
−34.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+67.3%
45−50
−67.3%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+55.4%
90−95
−55.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+36.3%
91
−36.3%
Valorant 210−220
+31.9%
160−170
−31.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+34%
90−95
−34%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+113%
39
−113%
Dota 2 140−150
+17.4%
120−130
−17.4%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+60.6%
71
−60.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+48.9%
90−95
−48.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+67.3%
45−50
−67.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+55.4%
90−95
−55.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+148%
50
−148%
Valorant 210−220
+31.9%
160−170
−31.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+35%
110−120
−35%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+75%
50−55
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+49.1%
160−170
−49.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+80%
40
−80%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Valorant 240−250
+22.8%
200−210
−22.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+42.4%
65−70
−42.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+65.4%
52
−65.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+65.6%
60−65
−65.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+81.1%
37
−81.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+67.9%
55−60
−67.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+72.7%
40−45
−72.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
Valorant 210−220
+59.9%
130−140
−59.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+58.3%
35−40
−58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Dota 2 100−110
+34.6%
75−80
−34.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+59.5%
40−45
−59.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+88%
24−27
−88%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+76.9%
24−27
−76.9%

This is how RTX A4000 Mobile and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 47% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 148% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A4000 Mobile surpassed RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.46 21.67
Recency 12 April 2021 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has a 54.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 91.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 28 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 762 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 Mobile or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.