ROG Ally Extreme GPU vs RTX A400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.45no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107Phoenix
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed727 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1762 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate42.29129.6
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2448
Tensor Cores24no data
Ray Tracing Cores612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length163 mm280 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2024 13 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

RTX A400 has an age advantage of 10 months.

ROG Ally Extreme GPU, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A400 and ROG Ally Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A400 is a workstation graphics card while ROG Ally Extreme GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU
ROG Ally Extreme GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate ROG Ally Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.