RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs RTX A4500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Mobile with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
45.22

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX A4500 Mobile by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.14
Power efficiency22.1417.08
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104AD102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores588818176
Core clock speed930 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate276.01,423
Floating-point processing power17.66 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs184568
Tensor Cores184568
Ray Tracing Cores46142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4500 Mobile 45.22
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.74
+65.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 Mobile 17424
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28801
+65.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−81%
181
+81%
1440p100−110
−70%
170
+70%
4K70−75
−68.6%
118
+68.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.56
1440pno data39.99
4Kno data57.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3200%
260−270
+3200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7700%
300−350
+7700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3200%
260−270
+3200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7700%
300−350
+7700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1667%
150−160
+1667%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3200%
260−270
+3200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7700%
300−350
+7700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2789%
260
+2789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−1683%
100−110
+1683%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−9350%
180−190
+9350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
110−120
+5800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 55−60

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX A4500 Mobile and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 81% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 70% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 69% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 9350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.22 74.74
Recency 22 March 2022 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 300 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has 114.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 65.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.