Radeon RX 6300 vs RTX A2000

Place in the ranking	142	357
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	87.82	no data
Power efficiency	34.95	31.60
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	Navi 24
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	10 August 2021 (3 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3328	768
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	12,000 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	32 Watt
Texture fill rate	124.8	97.92
Floating-point processing power	7.987 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	104	48
Tensor Cores	104	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	26	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	167 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a	2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 35.54
+142%

RX 6300 14.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13664
+142%

RX 6300 5648

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	94 +169%	35−40 −169%
1440p	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
4K	29 +190%	10−12 −190%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.78	no data
1440p	9.98	no data
4K	15.48	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	84 +180%	30−33 −180%
Elden Ring	86 +146%	35−40 −146%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +145%	40−45 −145%
Counter-Strike 2	62 +158%	24−27 −158%
Forza Horizon 4	166 +155%	65−70 −155%
Metro Exodus	106 +165%	40−45 −165%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +163%	27−30 −163%
Valorant	140−150 +158%	55−60 −158%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +145%	40−45 −145%
Counter-Strike 2	52 +148%	21−24 −148%
Dota 2	129 +158%	50−55 −158%
Elden Ring	120−130 +146%	50−55 −146%
Far Cry 5	136 +147%	55−60 −147%
Fortnite	160−170 +146%	65−70 −146%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +160%	50−55 −160%
Grand Theft Auto V	129 +158%	50−55 −158%
Metro Exodus	71 +163%	27−30 −163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +156%	75−80 −156%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +163%	27−30 −163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +146%	50−55 −146%
Valorant	140−150 +158%	55−60 −158%
World of Tanks	270−280 +154%	110−120 −154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +145%	40−45 −145%
Counter-Strike 2	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +166%	35−40 −166%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +142%	45−50 −142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +156%	75−80 −156%
Valorant	140−150 +158%	55−60 −158%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	58 +176%	21−24 −176%
Elden Ring	70−75 +159%	27−30 −159%
Grand Theft Auto V	58 +176%	21−24 −176%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
World of Tanks	220−230 +152%	90−95 −152%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +148%	27−30 −148%
Counter-Strike 2	26 +160%	10−11 −160%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +153%	45−50 −153%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +163%	30−33 −163%
Metro Exodus	62 +158%	24−27 −158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +161%	18−20 −161%
Valorant	100−110 +168%	40−45 −168%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Dota 2	56 +167%	21−24 −167%
Elden Ring	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Grand Theft Auto V	56 +167%	21−24 −167%
Metro Exodus	20 +150%	8−9 −150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +151%	45−50 −151%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +167%	21−24 −167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +143%	21−24 −143%
Fortnite	45−50 +172%	18−20 −172%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Valorant	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%