Radeon PRO W6300 vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 and Radeon PRO W6300, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
35.58
+147%

RTX A2000 outperforms PRO W6300 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.40no data
Power efficiency35.4340.18
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3328768
Core clock speed562 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate124.897.92
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs10448
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores2612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 35.58
+147%
PRO W6300 14.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13725
+147%
PRO W6300 5559

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+174%
35−40
−174%
1440p44
+175%
16−18
−175%
4K31
+158%
12−14
−158%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.68no data
1440p10.20no data
4K14.48no data

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.58 14.41
Recency 10 August 2021 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 25 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 146.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W6300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 565 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.