Radeon Instinct MI200 vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation86.05no data
Power efficiency36.67no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGA106Aldebaran
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33286656
Core clock speed562 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8707.2
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs48no data
TMUs104416
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores26no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1,638 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 300 Watt

RTX A2000 has 328.6% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 558 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.