RTX A4500 vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 and RTX A4500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
30.37

RTX A4500 outperforms RTX A2000 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.60no data
Power efficiency34.4318.96
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33287168
Core clock speed562 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8369.6
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs104224
Tensor Cores104224
Ray Tracing Cores2656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length167 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A2000 30.37
RTX A4500 47.79
+57.4%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
    • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
    • GeekBench 5 CUDA

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13570
RTX A4500 21352
+57.3%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX A2000 73324
RTX A4500 142086
+93.8%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX A2000 69150
RTX A4500 130864
+89.2%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

RTX A2000 84002
RTX A4500 171509
+104%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
−53.8%
140−150
+53.8%
1440p43
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
4K28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.93no data
1440p10.44no data
4K16.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
−54.3%
290−300
+54.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−51.3%
180−190
+51.3%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
−54.3%
290−300
+54.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Far Cry 5 108
−48.1%
160−170
+48.1%
Fortnite 140−150
−56.5%
230−240
+56.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 5 121
−57%
190−200
+57%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−52.7%
200−210
+52.7%
Valorant 200−210
−48.5%
300−310
+48.5%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−51.3%
180−190
+51.3%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
−54.3%
290−300
+54.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−44.9%
400−450
+44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Far Cry 5 98
−53.1%
150−160
+53.1%
Fortnite 140−150
−56.5%
230−240
+56.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 5 106
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
−55%
200−210
+55%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Metro Exodus 60
−50%
90−95
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−52.7%
200−210
+52.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
−53.8%
180−190
+53.8%
Valorant 200−210
−48.5%
300−310
+48.5%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−51.3%
180−190
+51.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Far Cry 5 91
−53.8%
140−150
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−52.7%
200−210
+52.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Valorant 200−210
−48.5%
300−310
+48.5%
Fortnite 140−150
−56.5%
230−240
+56.5%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−54.2%
350−400
+54.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Metro Exodus 34
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−54.3%
270−280
+54.3%
Valorant 230−240
−47.7%
350−400
+47.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−49.4%
130−140
+49.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Far Cry 5 61
−55.7%
95−100
+55.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−55.6%
140−150
+55.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Fortnite 80−85
−54.8%
130−140
+54.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
−51.8%
85−90
+51.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 20
−50%
30−33
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−50%
60−65
+50%
Valorant 190−200
−50.8%
300−310
+50.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 30
−50%
45−50
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−50%
90−95
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%
Fortnite 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%

This is how RTX A2000 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 51% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.37 47.79
Recency 10 August 2021 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 200 Watt

RTX A2000 has 185.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 57.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9
600 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
203 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.