Quadro P520 Max-Q vs RTX A2000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.55no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGA106GP108
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)23 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed893 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed1358 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate108.635.83
Floating-point processing power6.953 TFLOPS1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs8024
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s44 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.66.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 23 May 2019
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 18 Watt

RTX A2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

P520 Max-Q, on the other hand, has 427.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 Mobile and Quadro P520 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Max-Q
Quadro P520 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 93 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro P520 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.