GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs RTX A2000 Embedded

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated122
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiencyno data52.15
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107SAD107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed607 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1177 MHz1755 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate94.16140.4
Floating-point processing power6.026 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080
Tensor Cores8080
Ray Tracing Cores2020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

RTX A2000 Embedded has 42.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 Embedded and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2586 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.