Radeon PRO W7600 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Place in the ranking	15	128
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.01	70.09
Power efficiency	17.24	19.78
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	AD102	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$6,799	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7600 has 900% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	18176	2048
Core clock speed	915 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	2440 MHz
Number of transistors	76,300 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	1,423	312.3
Floating-point processing power	91.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	192	64
TMUs	568	128
Tensor Cores	568	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	142	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	960.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.15
+101%

PRO W7600 36.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28606
+101%

PRO W7600 14226

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	186 +107%	90−95 −107%
1440p	161 +101%	80−85 −101%
4K	117 +113%	55−60 −113%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	36.55	6.66
1440p	42.23	7.49
4K	58.11	10.89

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +114%	70−75 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +103%	65−70 −103%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +114%	110−120 −114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +113%	55−60 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +112%	85−90 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +102%	120−130 −102%
Hitman 3	120−130 +115%	60−65 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +103%	130−140 −103%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +107%	75−80 −107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +105%	60−65 −105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +108%	150−160 −108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +104%	75−80 −104%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +114%	70−75 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +103%	65−70 −103%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +114%	110−120 −114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +113%	55−60 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +112%	85−90 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +102%	120−130 −102%
Hitman 3	120−130 +115%	60−65 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +103%	130−140 −103%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +107%	75−80 −107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +105%	60−65 −105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +108%	150−160 −108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +112%	75−80 −112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +104%	75−80 −104%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +114%	70−75 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +103%	65−70 −103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +113%	55−60 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +102%	120−130 −102%
Hitman 3	120−130 +115%	60−65 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +103%	130−140 −103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +108%	150−160 −108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	260 +117%	120−130 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +104%	75−80 −104%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+105%

60−65
−105%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +108%	80−85 −108%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +104%	55−60 −104%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +118%	40−45 −118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +109%	45−50 −109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +105%	40−45 −105%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +110%	40−45 −110%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +108%	130−140 −108%
Hitman 3	100−110 +114%	50−55 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +110%	90−95 −110%
Metro Exodus	99 +120%	45−50 −120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +112%	100−105 −112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	219 +119%	100−105 −119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +118%	110−120 −118%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+115%

55−60
−115%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +120%	40−45 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +130%	30−33 −130%
Hitman 3	65−70 +117%	30−33 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 +118%	40−45 −118%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +116%	55−60 −116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184 +104%	90−95 −104%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +119%	27−30 −119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +103%	65−70 −103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +115%	55−60 −115%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +129%	21−24 −129%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+105%

40−45

−105%

This is how RTX 6000 Ada Generation and PRO W7600 compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 107% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 101% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 113% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	74.15	36.88
Recency	3 December 2022	3 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 101.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

PRO W7600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.