Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.43no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameDG2-512GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed930 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data192.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.169 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2022 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 6 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

P5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has 12.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 9 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.