H100 SXM5 80 GB vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.20no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD104GH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614416896
Core clock speed720 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1980 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate299.51,045
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs8024
TMUs192528
Tensor Cores192528
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount20 GB80 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/s1,681 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.99.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 700 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 900% lower power consumption.

H100 SXM5 80 GB, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and H100 SXM5 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80 GB
H100 SXM5 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate H100 SXM5 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.