Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.08no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD104no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2023 (1 year ago)31 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614430
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2175 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate417.6no data
Floating-point processing power26.73 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs192no data
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length245 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount20 GBno data
Memory bus width160 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2023 31 October 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 53 Watt

Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU has an age advantage of 2 months, and 145.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 4000 Ada Generation and Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation card while Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU
M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 36 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 66 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.