Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 73 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 39.03 | no data |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | AD107 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 February 2024 (less than a year ago) | 27 February 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2816 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2130 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 18,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 60 Watt (35 - 60 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 187.4 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 12 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | no data |
| TMUs | 88 | no data |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 60 Watt |
RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
