Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.80no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameno dataMeteor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072384
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.382 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed16000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 28 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 310.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook card while Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 18 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.