Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm vs RSX Reality Synthesizer

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302EE+GS-65nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed550 MHz147 MHz
Number of transistors302 million54 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate13.201.176
ROPs816
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Lengthno data230 mm
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit2560 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
OpenGLES 1.1N/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 1 July 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 45 Watt

RSX Reality Synthesizer has an age advantage of 5 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm, on the other hand, has 77.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RSX Reality Synthesizer and Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.