Arc 140T Mobile vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking565not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.20no data
Architectureno dataXe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameno dataArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2024 (less than a year ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data150.4
Floating-point processing powerno data4.813 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2024 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 75% lower power consumption.

Arc 140T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.