Xbox Series X GPU vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking814not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameno dataScarlett
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3328
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistorsno data15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data379.6
Floating-point performanceno data12.15 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Lengthno data301 mm
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data560.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 200 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 2757.1% lower power consumption.

Xbox Series X GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Xbox Series X GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook card while Xbox Series X GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
AMD Xbox Series X GPU
Xbox Series X GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1210 votes

Rate Xbox Series X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.