Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking808not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.50no data
Architectureno dataVolta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameno dataGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speedno data1327 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data15.67 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data876 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data897.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 27 March 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 250 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has an age advantage of 8 months, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 3471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook card while Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.