GeForce GT 440 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 690 with GeForce GT 440, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm Adreno 690
2018
7 Watt
2.72
+36.7%

Qualcomm Adreno 690 outperforms GT 440 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking806897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Power efficiency26.642.10
Architectureno dataFermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speedno data810 MHz
Number of transistorsno data585 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rateno data12.96
Floating-point processing powerno data0.311 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPUno data1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2.72
+36.7%
GT 440 1.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 1049
+36.8%
GT 440 767

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2933
+245%
GT 440 850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 690 and GT 440 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 690 is 39% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.72 1.99
Recency 6 December 2018 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 5 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has a 36.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 828.6% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 440 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 440 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GeForce GT 440

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1976 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.