GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 685 and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm Adreno 685
2018
7 Watt
2.54

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 1901% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.9830.42
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA103S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)25 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speedno data810 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1260 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rateno data292.3
Floating-point processing powerno data18.71 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.54
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 50.82
+1901%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 975
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19536
+1904%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 42275
+2094%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−2233%
140
+2233%
1440p4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
4K2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1190%
129
+1190%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2167%
136
+2167%
Elden Ring 4−5
−3500%
144
+3500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1817%
110−120
+1817%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1150%
125
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1933%
122
+1933%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−2031%
277
+2031%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2700%
112
+2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−840%
90−95
+840%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1817%
110−120
+1817%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1000%
110
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1583%
101
+1583%
Dota 2 6−7
−2400%
150
+2400%
Elden Ring 4−5
−4275%
175
+4275%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−587%
103
+587%
Fortnite 14−16
−1371%
200−210
+1371%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1662%
229
+1662%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−2333%
146
+2333%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−792%
210−220
+792%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−840%
90−95
+840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1640%
170−180
+1640%
World of Tanks 45−50
−494%
270−280
+494%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1817%
110−120
+1817%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−870%
97
+870%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1367%
88
+1367%
Dota 2 6−7
−2417%
151
+2417%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−627%
100−110
+627%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1438%
200
+1438%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−792%
210−220
+792%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 2−3
−5550%
113
+5550%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 101
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−872%
170−180
+872%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
World of Tanks 16−18
−1806%
300−350
+1806%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−600%
63
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2157%
150−160
+2157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2050%
86
+2050%
Valorant 9−10
−2378%
223
+2378%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−650%
120
+650%
Elden Ring 1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−700%
120
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2386%
170−180
+2386%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−700%
120
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3050%
60−65
+3050%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Dota 2 16−18
−694%
127
+694%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Fortnite 1−2
−8000%
80−85
+8000%
Valorant 2−3
−6300%
128
+6300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 341
+0%
341
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 174
+0%
174
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+0%
93
+0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 685 and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 2233% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 2150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 2850% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 8000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 50.82
Recency 6 December 2018 25 January 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 115 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1542.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1900.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 295 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.