Arc B570 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 685 with Arc B570, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm Adreno 685
2018
7 Watt
2.49

Arc B570 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 1238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking839162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.43
Power efficiency24.9115.56
Architectureno dataXe2 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speedno data2500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data360.0
Floating-point processing powerno data11.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data380.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.49
Arc B570 33.32
+1238%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 975
Arc B570 13023
+1236%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Valorant 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Dota 2 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Fortnite 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Valorant 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
World of Tanks 45−50
−1204%
600−650
+1204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Dota 2 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Valorant 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1194%
220−230
+1194%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
World of Tanks 16−18
−1194%
220−230
+1194%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Valorant 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1213%
210−220
+1213%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Dota 2 16−18
−1213%
210−220
+1213%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Fortnite 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Valorant 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.49 33.32
Recency 6 December 2018 16 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 150 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has 2042.9% lower power consumption.

Arc B570, on the other hand, has a 1238.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook card while Arc B570 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
Intel Arc B570
Arc B570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 54 votes

Rate Arc B570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Arc B570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.