Radeon RX 5600M vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in the ranking	865	242
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.87	10.52
Architecture	no data	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	no data	Navi 10
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)	7 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2304
Core clock speed	no data	1035 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	182.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.829 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	6 GB
Memory bus width	no data	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.11

RX 5600M 22.79
+980%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 813

RX 5600M 8795
+982%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

RX 5600M 24213
+1151%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −1071%	82 +1071%
1440p	4−5 −1250%	54 +1250%
4K	3−4 −1000%	33 +1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−620%

35−40
+620%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −644%	67 +644%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −6900%	70 +6900%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1750%	70−75 +1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −986%	76 +986%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −871%	130−140 +871%
Hitman 3	8−9 −738%	67 +738%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −405%	100−110 +405%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −4467%	137 +4467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −986%	76 +986%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −533%	75−80 +533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −482%	221 +482%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −5700%	58 +5700%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1750%	70−75 +1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −871%	68 +871%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −871%	130−140 +871%
Hitman 3	8−9 −700%	64 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −405%	100−110 +405%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3467%	107 +3467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −900%	70 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −533%	75−80 +533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −471%	217 +471%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −444%	49 +444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −4400%	45 +4400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −614%	50 +614%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −871%	130−140 +871%
Hitman 3	8−9 −625%	58 +625%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −381%	101 +381%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −533%	75−80 +533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −357%	64 +357%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +18.8%	32 −18.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−857%

67
+857%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −975%	40−45 +975%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −767%	24−27 +767%
Hitman 3	8−9 −375%	38 +375%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −943%	73 +943%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −1131%	197 +1131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−533%

35−40
+533%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1300%	14 +1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	30−35
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	13

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−400%

20−22
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +0%	24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	20 +0%	20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 680 and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

RX 5600M is 1071% faster in 1080p
RX 5600M is 1250% faster in 1440p
RX 5600M is 1000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 19% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5600M is 6900% faster.

All in all, in popular games: