Arc Pro A30M vs Quadro4 200 NVS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.10
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV17 A3DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date22 December 2003 (20 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed250 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors29 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x LFH60No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro4 200 NVS has 354.5% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 200 NVS and Arc Pro A30M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 200 NVS
Quadro4 200 NVS
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.