RTX A2000 vs Quadro4 100 NVS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.13
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV17 A3GA106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 December 2003 (20 years ago)10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3328
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors29 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000124.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x LFH604x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro4 100 NVS has 600% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 100 NVS and RTX A2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 100 NVS is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 100 NVS
Quadro4 100 NVS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 100 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 546 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.