Arc A310 vs Quadro T600 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with Arc A310, including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
18.37
+28.6%

T600 Mobile outperforms Arc A310 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.4713.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Core clock speed780 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate78.9664.00
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs5632
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 18.37
+28.6%
Arc A310 14.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7077
+28.6%
Arc A310 5502

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 Mobile 10498
Arc A310 11915
+13.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 Mobile 39112
Arc A310 46839
+19.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 Mobile 7928
Arc A310 8464
+6.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 Mobile 53941
+1.3%
Arc A310 53244

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T600 Mobile 2766
Arc A310 3269
+18.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+37.8%
37
−37.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−9.3%
55−60
+9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−9.1%
35−40
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 53
+26.2%
40−45
−26.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−7.6%
110−120
+7.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−7.3%
85−90
+7.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−11.3%
55−60
+11.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−9.3%
55−60
+9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−9.1%
35−40
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 49
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−7.6%
110−120
+7.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−7.3%
85−90
+7.3%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−10.7%
60−65
+10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−66.7%
65
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 45
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−7.6%
110−120
+7.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−11.4%
95−100
+11.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−8%
100−110
+8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−9.5%
90−95
+9.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
+0%
54
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how T600 Mobile and Arc A310 compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 38% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 Mobile is 27% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A310 is 67% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • Arc A310 is ahead in 40 tests (61%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.37 14.28
Recency 12 April 2021 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

T600 Mobile has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A310 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
Intel Arc A310
Arc A310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 254 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.