Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Quadro T600 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
18.37
+6.9%

T600 Mobile outperforms Arc 7-Cores iGPU by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.47no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameTU117Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8967
Core clock speed780 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate78.96no data
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 18.37
+6.9%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.19

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 Mobile 10498
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795
+12.3%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 Mobile 39112
+1.3%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 Mobile 7928
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449
+6.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 Mobile 53941
+18.2%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+50%
34
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−5.6%
55−60
+5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 53
+39.5%
38
−39.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−7.5%
55−60
+7.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−5.6%
55−60
+5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 49
+44.1%
34
−44.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−46.2%
55−60
+46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−5.6%
55−60
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 45
+28.6%
35
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+27.3%
22
−27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−9.7%
30−35
+9.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−6.8%
90−95
+6.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−5%
100−110
+5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−6%
85−90
+6%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how T600 Mobile and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 50% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 Mobile is 44% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 46% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.37 17.19
Recency 12 April 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

T600 Mobile has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 7-Cores iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro T600 Mobile and Arc 7-Cores iGPU.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.