RTX A4000 vs Quadro T500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile with RTX A4000, including specs and performance data.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
9.01

RTX A4000 outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.4624.88
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date2 December 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8966144
Core clock speed1365 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92299.5
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs56192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−456%
200−210
+456%
1440p15
−433%
80−85
+433%
4K17
−459%
95−100
+459%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Elden Ring 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−400%
40−45
+400%
Elden Ring 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry 5 30
−433%
160−170
+433%
Fortnite 50−55
−447%
290−300
+447%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
Valorant 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
Dota 2 90
−456%
500−550
+456%
Elden Ring 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry 5 28
−436%
150−160
+436%
Fortnite 50−55
−447%
290−300
+447%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
−448%
170−180
+448%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−436%
150−160
+436%
Valorant 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
World of Tanks 130−140
−426%
700−750
+426%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−440%
27−30
+440%
Dota 2 75
−433%
400−450
+433%
Far Cry 5 27
−456%
150−160
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−426%
100−105
+426%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−447%
290−300
+447%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−438%
70−75
+438%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Valorant 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Grand Theft Auto V 14
−436%
75−80
+436%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Valorant 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Dota 2 28
−436%
150−160
+436%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

This is how T500 Mobile and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 456% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 is 433% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4000 is 459% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 50.60
Recency 2 December 2020 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 140 Watt

T500 Mobile has 677.8% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has a 461.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 108 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 641 vote

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.