Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro T1000

Place in the ranking	330	481
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	23.18	22.74
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	TU117	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	96
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12_1
OpenGL	4.6	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 +66.7%	27 −66.7%
1440p	27−30 +68.8%	16 −68.8%
4K	18−21 +63.6%	11 −63.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	15 +0%	15 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +0%	20 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	15 +0%	15 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +0%	14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	38 +0%	38 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	22 +0%	22 +0%
Metro Exodus	29 +0%	29 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
Valorant	26 +0%	26 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12 +0%	12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +0%	11 +0%
Dota 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
Far Cry 5	31 +0%	31 +0%
Fortnite	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30 +0%	30 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	17 +0%	17 +0%
Metro Exodus	19 +0%	19 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8 +0%	8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
World of Tanks	96 +0%	96 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	11 +0%	11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Dota 2	47 +0%	47 +0%
Far Cry 5	34 +0%	34 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24 +0%	24 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	22 +0%	22 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	23 +0%	23 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7 +0%	7 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 +0%	7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
World of Tanks	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3 +0%	3 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	19 +0%	19 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	8 +0%	8 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	8 +0%	8 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 +0%	8 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	20 +0%	20 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Fortnite	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +0%	11 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how Quadro T1000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

Quadro T1000 is 67% faster in 1080p
Quadro T1000 is 69% faster in 1440p
Quadro T1000 is 64% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.62	9.13
Recency	27 May 2019	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt

Quadro T1000 has a 82% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.