A100 SXM4 80 GB vs Quadro T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking323not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)16 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed1395 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rateno data609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 gflops
ROPsno data160
TMUsno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data80 GB
Memory bus widthno data5120 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 16 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 400 Watt

Quadro T1000 has 700% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T1000 and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation graphics card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 357 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.