UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	318	1004
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	23.43	9.61
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	TU117	Gen. 11
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	24
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.84	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.235 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.95
+1119%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 1.39

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 Mobile 11377
+1232%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 854

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1000 Mobile 31509
+824%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
+1253%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 645

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 53629
+992%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 4911

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 375510
+761%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 43610

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
+1732%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 178

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	61 +663%	8 −663%
4K	48 +1500%	3−4 −1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30
+575%

4−5

−575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +700%	6−7 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +1275%	4−5 −1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +1225%	4−5 −1225%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
Far Cry 5	49 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Forza Horizon 4	119 +3867%	3−4 −3867%
Hitman 3	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +500%	14−16 −500%
Metro Exodus	83 +1283%	6−7 −1283%
Red Dead Redemption 2	67 +3250%	2−3 −3250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +155%	30−35 −155%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +1275%	4−5 −1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +1075%	4−5 −1075%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
Far Cry 5	41 +4000%	1−2 −4000%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +3700%	3−4 −3700%
Hitman 3	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +500%	14−16 −500%
Metro Exodus	63 +1160%	5−6 −1160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	52 +2500%	2−3 −2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +817%	6 −817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +255%	10−12 −255%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +155%	30−35 −155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29 +383%	6−7 −383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 +700%	4−5 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
Far Cry 5	31 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +3500%	3−4 −3500%
Hitman 3	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +500%	14−16 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +218%	10−12 −218%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +155%	30−35 −155%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50
+2400%

2−3

−2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +1200%	7−8 −1200%
Hitman 3	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +580%	5−6 −580%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +1450%	2−3 −1450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +1600%	6−7 −1600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+600%

4−5

−600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14	0−1
Hitman 3	12−14	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +1129%	7−8 −1129%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+400%

3−4

−400%

This is how T1000 Mobile and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

T1000 Mobile is 663% faster in 1080p
T1000 Mobile is 1500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, T1000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.95	1.39
Recency	27 May 2019	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	4 Watt

T1000 Mobile has a 1119.4% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.