Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	324	426
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	23.47	19.01
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	no data
GPU code name	TU117	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1536
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.84	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.235 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 17.01
+54.4%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.02

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 Mobile 11377
+61.1%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1000 Mobile 31509
+31%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
+25%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
+64%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 +61.5%	39 −61.5%
4K	48 +60%	30−35 −60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +30.4%	23 −30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Elden Ring	50−55 +65.6%	30−35 −65.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +25%	56 −25%
Metro Exodus	48 +60%	30−33 −60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	67 +131%	27−30 −131%
Valorant	78 +85.7%	40−45 −85.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +57.9%	19 −57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Dota 2	83 +131%	36 −131%
Elden Ring	50−55 +65.6%	30−35 −65.6%
Far Cry 5	69 +56.8%	40−45 −56.8%
Fortnite	90−95 +45.3%	60−65 −45.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +45.8%	48 −45.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	68 +88.9%	36 −88.9%
Metro Exodus	36 +20%	30−33 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	134 +59.5%	80−85 −59.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 −16%	27−30 +16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +57.6%	30−35 −57.6%
Valorant	44 +4.8%	40−45 −4.8%
World of Tanks	210−220 +35.5%	150−160 −35.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +76.5%	17 −76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Dota 2	107 +64.6%	65−70 −64.6%
Far Cry 5	77 +75%	40−45 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +70.7%	41 −70.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +41.7%	80−85 −41.7%
Valorant	65−70 +61.9%	40−45 −61.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Elden Ring	27−30 +68.8%	16−18 −68.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +73.3%	14−16 −73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +58%	100−105 −58%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
World of Tanks	110−120 +49.4%	75−80 −49.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +68%	24−27 −68%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +72.7%	21−24 −72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +69.2%	12−14 −69.2%
Valorant	40−45 +59.3%	27−30 −59.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Dota 2	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Elden Ring	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +59.4%	30−35 −59.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Dota 2	48 +60%	30−33 −60%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +69.2%	12−14 −69.2%
Fortnite	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Valorant	18−20 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%

This is how T1000 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

T1000 Mobile is 62% faster in 1080p
T1000 Mobile is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 131% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 16% faster.

All in all, in popular games: