Matrox Millennium G400 MAX vs Quadro RTX A6000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.36no data
Power efficiency13.63no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGA102Toucan
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10752no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz150 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate604.80.3
Floating-point processing power38.71 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1122
TMUs3362
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount48 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 20 May 1999
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 250 nm

RTX A6000 has an age advantage of 21 year, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX A6000 and Matrox Millennium G400 MAX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox Millennium G400 MAX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
Matrox Millennium G400 MAX
Millennium G400 MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 462 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.