Radeon Vega 7 vs Quadro RTX 8100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated526
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiencyno data11.48
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA102Cezanne
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10752448
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1860 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate625.053.20
Floating-point processing power40 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs33628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length313 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed16 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 677.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8100 and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8100
Quadro RTX 8100
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1885 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.