Radeon Instinct MI300 vs Quadro RTX 8000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.87no data
Power efficiency13.40no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameTU102Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores460814080
Core clock speed1395 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate509.81,496
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs96no data
TMUs288880
Tensor Cores576880
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount48 GB128 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 600 Watt

RTX 8000 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 464 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.