Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Quadro RTX 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
48.56
+36.6%

RTX 6000 outperforms Pro Vega 64X by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Power efficiency13.029.91
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU102Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084096
Core clock speed1440 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8375.8
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288256
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 48.56
+36.6%
Pro Vega 64X 35.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 18733
+36.7%
Pro Vega 64X 13708

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 6000 148952
+97.4%
Pro Vega 64X 75438

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.56 35.54
Recency 13 August 2018 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 36.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 130 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.