Arc 140T Mobile vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameTU102Arrow Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081024
Core clock speed1305 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate449.3150.4
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28864
Tensor Cores576128
Ray Tracing Cores728

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 140T Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 642.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation card while Arc 140T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 Passive or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.