UHD Graphics G1 vs Quadro RTX 5000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking96not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.31no data
Power efficiency12.44no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTU104Ice Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)29 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072256
Core clock speed1620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate348.514.40
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs19216
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 has an age advantage of 9 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and UHD Graphics G1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics G1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
Intel UHD Graphics G1
UHD Graphics G1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 204 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 165 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.