Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs Quadro RTX 5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking104not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.98no data
Power efficiency12.19no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU104GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)26 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30725120
Core clock speed1620 MHz1245 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1597 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5511.0
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS16.35 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs192320
Tensor Cores384640
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s1,133 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 5000 has 8.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 222 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 16 votes

Rate Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.