GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Quadro RTX 5000
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 96 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.31 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.44 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | C89 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 486 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 348.5 | 7.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.15 TFLOPS | 0.0912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 8 |
| TMUs | 192 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 1 April 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 23 Watt |
RTX 5000 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
320M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and GeForce 320M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 320M Mac Edition is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
