Radeon HD 7750M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with Radeon HD 7750M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
36.03
+1066%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms HD 7750M by a whopping 1066% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.637.96
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Chelsea
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072512
Core clock speed1035 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate296.618.40
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 36.03
+1066%
HD 7750M 3.09

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
+1081%
HD 7750M 2085

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+1180%
10−12
−1180%
1440p86
+1129%
7−8
−1129%
4K53
+1225%
4−5
−1225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+1056%
9−10
−1056%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+2380%
5−6
−2380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 125
+1686%
7−8
−1686%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+1283%
6−7
−1283%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+1088%
8−9
−1088%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1012%
16−18
−1012%
Hitman 3 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+600%
21−24
−600%
Metro Exodus 144
+3500%
4−5
−3500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+1313%
8−9
−1313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+228%
35−40
−228%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+2380%
5−6
−2380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+1586%
7−8
−1586%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+1283%
6−7
−1283%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+1088%
8−9
−1088%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1012%
16−18
−1012%
Hitman 3 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+600%
21−24
−600%
Metro Exodus 144
+3500%
4−5
−3500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+1138%
8−9
−1138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+471%
14−16
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+228%
35−40
−228%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+1157%
7−8
−1157%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+1283%
6−7
−1283%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1012%
16−18
−1012%
Hitman 3 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+600%
21−24
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+614%
14−16
−614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+228%
35−40
−228%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+1250%
8−9
−1250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+1380%
5−6
−1380%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1080%
5−6
−1080%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+2000%
3−4
−2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+1106%
18−20
−1106%
Hitman 3 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+938%
8−9
−938%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1100%
6−7
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+900%
18−20
−900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90
+1400%
6−7
−1400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Hitman 3 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1179%
14−16
−1179%
Metro Exodus 76
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+1083%
6−7
−1083%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+5200%
1−2
−5200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and HD 7750M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 1180% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 1129% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 1225% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 6500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5000 Mobile surpassed HD 7750M in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.03 3.09
Recency 27 May 2019 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 28 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 1066% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7750M, on the other hand, has 292.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 7750M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Radeon HD 7750M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.